A Monkey Boy Comments

I just received this comment from another monkey boy who is ashamed of his baptized name. He wrote:

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post “Bag o’ Snakes”:

I’m an arrogant ass who won’t even state my name, yet call others out on being ashamed of their baptism.

I repent of my ways and for outright stealing private correspondence and then posting it publicly, proving once and for all that I do not possess the smallest trace of testicular fortitude. Instead of dealing with the exegetical and theological issues, I would rather slander other brothers in Christ.

Why? Because I’m sure Jesus would approve.

And so would Jack Bauer.

Well, you are an arrogant ass (ignorant too) and I don’t blame you for not stating your name. But let me answer your argument point for point, to demonstrate your ignorance.

I only call on monkey boys to state their real name because the Fearless Leader — Beelzeblog — has declared that I am ashamed of my baptized name because I host a fully documented anonymous attack blog. Of course, this argument is just plain silly because he refuses to acknowledge his well-deserved reputation for harassing, bullying, and intimidating anyone who criticizes the Kult. Furthermore, the Great Protector doesn’t account for all the times that he adopted pseudonyms on the local listserv to defend his “good name,” which is a subject for another website. Frankly, if anyone has reason to be ashamed of their baptized name, it’s Douglas James Wilson, founder of this century’s most malevolent non-Christian cult. But I think we’ve established he has no shame.

Your second paragraph asserts that I stole “private correspondence.” This is not true and your argument (and your anger) disappears the moment you admit the truth. You also assert that you “do not possess the smallest trace of testicular fortitude,” and I must agree. After all, you are a monkey boy who is ashamed of his baptized name.

You continue by asserting that I refuse to deal with “the exegetical and theological issues.” And I have to admit that this is true because better men than me have already demolished the FV seven times from Sunday. But the FVists insist that these biblical scholars and trained theologians have misrepresented them, which immediately makes this a character issue. Someone’s lying. Personally, I find it hard to believe that seven Reformed denominations and countless micro-denominations have condemned the Federal Vision based upon numerous misrepresentations made by honorable men in the Church, which is one reason I focus on the FVists’ deficient moral characters as witnessed by their email exchange titled “Bag o’ Snakes.” Maybe you would understand this point better if I named the post “House o’ Liars.”

Monkey Boy continues, stating, “I would rather slander other brothers in Christ.” First of all, it’s not slander if it’s in writing; it’s libel. Second, it’s neither libel nor slander if it’s true. And third, I do not count any of these Bozos brothers in Christ. The closest biblical definition for them is “false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves” (Matt. 7:15). And I point to the email exchange “Bag o’ Snakes” as one more proof of their two-faced duplicity (is that redundant?).

Finally, Monkey Boy writes, “Why? Because I’m sure Jesus would approve. And so would Jack Bauer.” Yes, Jesus does approve of exposing hypocrites but methinks you don’t know this because your too busy watching TV instead of reading your Bible.

Thank you.

PS: You really need to do something about your pent-up anger.