Tuesday, January 15, 2008

“Meet the Theonomists”

Earlier today I re-read “Meet the Theonomists” for the first time in many a moon and was blown away at Dr. Roche’s keen analysis and incredible foresight. Eight years ago he identified the key players in the Federal Vision — Wilson, Jordan, Leithart, Wilkins, Meyers, Schlissel, Smith, Bledsoe (I deleted his emails from “Bag o’ Snakes”) — before they ever had their Vision. He also identified their “high-church ecclesiocentrism,” their aberrant covenant soteriology, their depreciation of the new birth for “covenant children,” and in Wilson’s and Wilkins’ case, their absurd revision of Southern history (he even smelled plagiarism). Moreover, he saw from afar the rivalry between Wilson and Sandlin (if you don’t know how that one ended, read this), and back then he affirmed James Jordan’s “bizarre” hermeneutic.

Of course, since there was no Federal Vision when Dr. Roche wrote this essay (he wrote it two years before the 2002 AAPC), he categorized his analysis under “theonomy.” Nevertheless, it’s interesting to see how the theonomists have recast their message since then and how events have unfolded. Take the time to read “Meet the Theonomists” by Dr. Thomas Roche. He saw the Federal Vision in its germ state long before the Auburn Avenue clowns saw its infectious value and hatched it into their disease.

Thank you.

4 comments:

anonymous8 said...

I read the entire thing last night. I wonder if the gentleman has anything new to add today. It would be interesting to get his take eight years, or so, on.

Mark T. said...

Agreed.

Dr. Roche,

If you’re out there, we welcome your thoughts.

Anonymous said...

It's not only Jordan's biblical hermeneutic that's bizarre. Note comments from the same here:

http://rongleason.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-armstrongs-meddling.html

Mark T. said...

Anon,

Thanks for the link; who would have thunk it would lead to this?