tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post3434314975101861293..comments2023-06-19T01:01:06.019-07:00Comments on Fœdero Schism: Bag o’ SnakesMark T.http://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comBlogger46125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-67554191494856989222008-01-08T05:39:00.000-08:002008-01-08T05:39:00.000-08:00Mate,Methinks you a bit confused. No one stole any...Mate,<BR/><BR/>Methinks you a bit confused. No one stole anything and I’m not sure why you would say that. But I can imagine the Lord Jesus exposing hypocrisy without apology.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-62479160535952216712008-01-08T04:53:00.000-08:002008-01-08T04:53:00.000-08:00mate,I'm from Australia, so in a certain sense I'm...mate,<BR/>I'm from Australia, so in a certain sense I'm totally not involved in this. These guys may well be horrible heritics, leading their churches astray, leading terrible hypocritical lives, but that it hardly an excuse for stealing their correspondence and tearing into them. Can you imagine Jesus standing before the Father with dead bodies lying around, and Jesus pouting and saying, "they started it!". Trust your Lord enough to calm down and humbly obey him. He has the church in his hands, and he will bring all things to account...so tremble.. for your enemies, and for yourselfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-91115205050083105992008-01-07T06:22:00.000-08:002008-01-07T06:22:00.000-08:00William,We are working from entirely different par...William,<BR/><BR/>We are working from entirely different paradigms. Whereas you reserve the right to impugn my character and insult me, you apparently expect me to adopt a medieval lifestyle of fasting and prayer for the men who have declared in public that they know (<I>ginosko,</I> ironic, eh?) the Westminster divines’ original intents while they scheme in private for ways to advance their hate.<BR/><BR/>Double standard aside, you have no idea how much I have prayed for these men and it is none of your business. However, I will tell you that you are witnessing the answer to my prayers. Furthermore, I will speculate that since you came back for more, the problem here is that you lack the wherewithal to process the Federal Visionists’ obvious hypocrisy.<BR/><BR/>So let’s turn the tables and apply your high standards that you expect of me to the leaders of the new Reformation: Did they pray the men that they bashed before they ripped them? I mean did they REALLY pray for them with their whole heart? Did they go before the Lord and beg him to work in their lives since they think them all so lost? Are they that concerned with their well-being that they are interested in petitioning the Lord on their behalf? Do they spend as much energy praying for them as they do working to ruin their reputations on their private gossip group?<BR/><BR/>You see, William, it doesn’t work, does it? And the reason it doesn’t work is because as much as you want to make ME the issue, you still cannot account for the Federal Visionists’ brazen hypocrisy. Even worse, you know, as I know, that there are no mitigating circumstances here — only aggravating. The Federal Visionists committed these sins with the assumed understanding that no one was watching and that God’s rules didn’t apply. And they happily granted one another these assumptions — this agreed-upon covenant — because they are flaming hypocrites. <I>“Go in, and behold the wicked abominations that they do here.”</I> (Ezek 8:9)<BR/><BR/>Now connect the next dot: Many of these men hold offices requiring them to rule over God’s people, and since they are this abusive and duplicitous in real life, then how does their iniquity manifest itself in their ministries and how does it affect the daily lives of their sheep? When you muster the courage to ask this question, you will begin to see the real issue.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-24007747004665407052008-01-06T22:27:00.000-08:002008-01-06T22:27:00.000-08:00Dear Brother,Excellent and very revealing. As a f...Dear Brother,<BR/>Excellent and very revealing. As a former internet engineer (MCSE)[Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer), certified in internet and NT 4 technologies, and a former adjunct professor at DeVry College of Technology, Toronto, Ontario Canada I can tell you that Internet providers have been successfully sued by both private individuals and corporations for manipulating stock. They were sued to gain what were considered "private emails" so that civil and criminal proceedings might be begun against market manipulators. The present state of the law as it pertains to the internet and world wide web is this, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PRIVATE EMAIL. All emails by their very nature are equivalent to sending a postcard through the postal service. You want privacy, then set up an encrypted network via tcp/ip tunnelling, institute firewalls at both ends and use secured lines. THEN you can say PRIVATE and it mean something. I thought Christians were supposed to obey the civil magistrate? Rom 13. Notice you were accused of a criminal/civil breach--not a spiritual one. In other words you were threatened with sanctions for breaking the law, not for sinning. Thats the first point of interest. So to all the Internet naive out there who do not know a bit from a byte and think a CD tray is for a coffee cup--stop showing your ignorance. There may have been sin, but not crime.<BR/><BR/>Secondly, as one of the last comments noted you dont use gutter talk in front of 200 observers. Private does not mean "between me and you and 198 others". That's larger than most churches.<BR/><BR/>Thirdly, these men have made public comments that are CONTRADICTED by their private behaviour--their hypocrisy is being revealed. Its a filthy job to expose such men, but I notice that Paul had no problem with mentioning Hymenaeus, Philetus, and Alexander. I guess he was guilty of slander too.<BR/><BR/>Finally, as an individual who was victim of a similar conspiracy some 14 years ago I understand EXACTLY what is going on. I was excommunicated, without trial, without notice, without defense, without opportunity to protest; I was not invited to presbytery meetings where my character was assassinated, and my ruling elder repented and apologized for participating in a plot to have me deposed. A SECRET plot. I thank God for the one friend in this REFORMED denomination who "slandered" the conspirators by warning me what was up. They crucified him for it, and since then, he has become so disgusted by his experience, he has left the ministry. I had 3 nervous breakdowns, and could not afford to feed my family. The leaders of this Reformed Presbyterian denomination called black brothers "nigger" in private, spoke of their sympathy for the Adolph Hitler, believed that integration was wrong, and publicly held to the Westminster Standards, all the while watching pornography at a General Assembly. Am I a slanderer? I wish to God (I am not swearing) that somebody had "slandered" them to me, and had warned me about them. I witnessed all of this--and beside that, tampering with the federal mail (to surreptiously get a writ of excommunication into the hands of a teaching elder)--which is a felony. I would have loved to have been warned with some "slander".<BR/><BR/>So, I thank God, that I am not in a local church, because if the kind of thinking here is indicative of the general level of critical thinking among "Reformed" churches, then I would just be ground up and spit out again. Besides that I live in Ontario, where you are Reformed if you ordain women, and believe the Bible is full of errors.<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work.<BR/><BR/>GusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-30656774794200830152008-01-06T19:08:00.000-08:002008-01-06T19:08:00.000-08:00You know, I am curious. Do you pray for these mem...You know, I am curious. Do you pray for these mem? I mean do you REALLY pray for them with your whole heart? Do you go before the Lord and beg him to work in their lives (since you think they apparently need it)? Are you that concerned with their well-being that you are interested in petitioning the Lord on their behalf? Do you spend as much energy praying for them as you do working to display their apparent sins on this blog?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09819442956662913188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-33557654742712393782008-01-06T07:42:00.000-08:002008-01-06T07:42:00.000-08:00Andy,Someone commented above that the FVists are l...Andy,<BR/><BR/>Someone commented above that the FVists are lazy conspirators. This is true, and you are exactly right. Meyers slammed Jr. for being in a fog when he has no idea what he says from one day to the next, or whose listening. “Private” conversations don’t take place on Yahoo and they know it. Furthermore, if I burn a man’s reputation to the ground in front of a reading audience (many of whom are complete strangers), I don’t remove my sin by saying, “Now, this is a secret between all of us.” I aggravate it. What a miserable lot of fools; they are completely lost and they don’t even know it.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-58856614706549571492008-01-06T07:30:00.000-08:002008-01-06T07:30:00.000-08:00Michael,You took 900 words to say . . . well, I’m ...Michael,<BR/><BR/>You took 900 words to say . . . well, I’m not sure. Lay off the bird food or else you’ll tempt us to think you a bird brain.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-33861512545040524242008-01-06T07:24:00.000-08:002008-01-06T07:24:00.000-08:00John,Once again you have demonstrated that you hav...John,<BR/><BR/>Once again you have demonstrated that you have the reading-comprehension level of chimpanzee hooked up to an intravenous wire dripping with Budweiser suds. So here’s the deal, if you ignore or distort my statements again, I will not respond to you because no monkey boy is worth my time unless they show a willingness to understand and learn. Therefore, please re-read our exchanges and notice the number of fabrications you made. This is typical of a monkey boy who lives in the land of DUMB but it is impossible for rational persons to communicate with. If you want to try it again, carefully thinking through each proposition sans distortion, then we may proceed. If not, then I am happy to bid you farewell that you serve the lord your Doug with all your might.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-83378850444000480472008-01-06T00:21:00.000-08:002008-01-06T00:21:00.000-08:00The absurd FVers try to present this as a "private...The absurd FVers try to present this as a "private conversation" which you have "illicitly" published. The reality is that some 200 people who paid to be on the BH list, most of whom did not participate in the libel and backbiting, were witnesses to it. The "private conversation" was apparently between a handful of FV leading lights, while a couple of hundred bystanders looked on. Jeff Meyers was running his potty mouth while he, in all likelihood, didn't even know who the other 200 "conversationalists" were. <BR/><BR/>Now that Meyers has been exposed on both the BH list and the Wrightsaid list (where he stated that the RCUS ministers were a "pen of swine"), I wonder if he realizes yet that he shouldn't write anything that he doesn't want the world to read?Andy Gilmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03454622153759887438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-86821887160942667002008-01-05T21:35:00.000-08:002008-01-05T21:35:00.000-08:00Hi there folks!I am curious and found my way in he...Hi there folks!<BR/><BR/>I am curious and found my way in here from another's wonderful blog.<BR/><BR/>I'm Michael, that's my name, given at birth. I have no feathers but my son has four pigeons and feathers are found all around my place.<BR/><BR/>I wanted to quote one poster, hopefully he's reading this now?<BR/><BR/>the poster said: "Tell me, did you speak with any of these men about these so called improprieties? Furthermore, even if what you are retelling is true (and not edited in any way which is impossible for anyone to know) what benefit to the Church does this offer?"<BR/><BR/>I want to address a couple of concerns therein, but first, let me thump on the Bible from the Prophet who probably has a lot to say on these things in here:<BR/><BR/>Jer 17:5 Thus says the LORD: "Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the LORD. <BR/>Jer 17:6 He is like a shrub in the desert, and shall not see any good come. He shall dwell in the parched places of the wilderness, in an uninhabited salt land. <BR/>Jer 17:7 "Blessed is the man who trusts in the LORD, whose trust is the LORD. <BR/>Jer 17:8 He is like a tree planted by water, that sends out its roots by the stream, and does not fear when heat comes, for its leaves remain green, and is not anxious in the year of drought, for it does not cease to bear fruit." <BR/>Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it? <BR/>Jer 17:10 "I the LORD search the heart and test the mind, to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds." <BR/><BR/>Yes and amen to that, if I might say so, "So"?<BR/><BR/>Poster, well just a humble observation about your words quoted above now.<BR/><BR/>God knows all about it. So it is quite possible God knows if Mark T. is telling the truth. I wouldn't be trusting him anyway! Why? Jeremiah said so, that's why.<BR/><BR/>Those who wrote those emails do too. Those who wrote those emails have some explaining to do and not to Mark T.<BR/><BR/>Here, we read books. We have looked at Douglas Wilson's mind some, his books, keeping in mind that Jeremiah has pointed out how deceitful Doug's mind and heart "really" are so we are guarded when reading his books. When we read books we want to gain some insight into fruit bearing in our daily lives as testimonies lived out to our wives and children and to the Public and Private school teachers and to the general and private public, we, the Elect, are called to be His reps. to/for, so I was slightly taken back when I read your words about "what benefit" this all has within the Church.<BR/><BR/>There, have I elevated myself enough for you?<BR/><BR/>It does seem a bit unseemly Mark T. to betray the confidence of another. What mysteries lie beneath the surface of all this? "hmmmmmm"<BR/><BR/>I, for one don't fault you. I don't fault James Jordan either. If this is the way he discovers Our Dear Lord's sufferings, ah, He too had Judas Iscariot in His inner circle, ah, an inner circle mind you not of His choosing, if you want to believe Our Dear Lord's Words when He said He did nothing but what He saw Our Heavenly Father do first. What? Put a traitor in the camp of those sinners! Yikes!!! <BR/><BR/>I digress a bit; Mark, how did He know to do what Our Heavenly Father was doing in selecting a traitor to keep His integrity in tack? After all, just think of the shame it would have caused the Holy Ghost if God, Our Heavenly Father, did not keep His prophetic Word about him and be found a liar? "hmmmmmm". Who would trust God at His Word, then?<BR/><BR/>Ok, back now to my points to the poster. Yes, God knows what's up with this deal. Yes, James Jordan should be ashamed to find out someone inside his secret society is an untrustworthy tramp, a fallen brother, perhaps? But, poster, trying to go along with you, how does that make Mark T. what you seem to imply him to be? Methinks Job is in order here:<BR/><BR/>Job 12:1 Then Job answered and said: <BR/>Job 12:2 "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you. <BR/>Job 12:3 But I have understanding as well as you; I am not inferior to you. Who does not know such things as these? <BR/><BR/><BR/>There is great benefit to me, a member of God's Holy Christian Church, blood washed and daily sanctified, wretch that I am, to know what is going on. After all, I am alive today too and hope to join up with all those who have gone on before us already, some day. It is my firm conviction and "hope".<BR/><BR/>Well, there, from a nobody novice who just might have bitten off more than one such as I am care to chew.<BR/><BR/>One final farewell verse to set a course for a Godly outcome to all this then, but when?:<BR/><BR/>1Ti 1:5 The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Well then, me too!<BR/>When?<BR/><BR/>MichaelAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-82568756651231567542008-01-05T20:09:00.000-08:002008-01-05T20:09:00.000-08:00Mark T -Fine, we can roll with that. While you pr...Mark T -<BR/>Fine, we can roll with that. While you pretend that our Fearless Leader is Doug Wilson, don't forget that the fearless leader of both of us is Christ. What does Christ say? It is sadly desperate that you mock some of us for being inconsistent with the one you take to be our leader (an incorrect assumption, since our head is Christ and not those who serve as his under-shepherds, and for that matter I'm not a member of the church Doug Wilson pastors, nor have I ever been), and yet you are inconsistent with your fearless leader, who you claim to be Christ. God doesn't respect anonymous testimony, so why are you making it and expecting us to listen? It seems you are at odds with your Lord.<BR/><BR/>Now, I'd like to see you show me this... 1) How am I being patently dishonest? Where have I said that I affirm and agree with the ideas presented by the Federal Vision, if they really are false? 2) How am I being willfully blind? By not accepting every single thing that comes to me (i.e., your words)? By discerning everything that everybody says? By not blindly taking your word at face value? 3) How am I blindly loyal to Doug Wilson? Sure, I have a link to his blog. You also happen to regularly link to Mr. Wilson's blog, and you don't seem to think that's inconsistent with also happening to not blindly follow Doug Wilson.<BR/><BR/>So your accusations are well-received but also well ignored, as you don't seem to have the presence of mind to think about this without assuming absolutely the worst about everyone.<BR/><BR/>Now, as for your request. I asked the following:<BR/>"Like I said in my last post, I don't get where there's any issue here. It would be helpful if you could establish 1a) where these guys have said the things you claim they did, 1b) what claims they were responding to (just to set the context), and 2) how this conversation shows that it wasn't true. I don't see, at present, anything of what you were saying. Remember that there are some of us who are newer to this conversation and don't have the benefit of having been embroiled in it from the beginning."<BR/><BR/>As you haven't done any of this, it is a little bit hard to point to anything that you've said. My contention is exactly this: Where are the connections? You don't make any, so I consequentially can't point to them. Of course, if you'd be so pleased as to grace me with the doing of this, I would then likely have something to actually disagree with (although there's no telling what the future holds).<BR/><BR/>God bless.<BR/>John Nicely<BR/>River CRC (Redlands, CA)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-32522292848002434102008-01-05T15:30:00.000-08:002008-01-05T15:30:00.000-08:00John,I have made it clear to everyone but you that...John,<BR/><BR/>I have made it clear to everyone but you that I have no objection to anonymity except when monkey boys use it despite their Fearless Leader’s command. If you follow the argument, these monkey boys are ashamed of their baptized names. In this only do I commend you. Your shame lies in your patent dishonesty, your willful blindness, and your blind loyalty to Beelzeblog, which accounts for the first eight words of this comment.<BR/><BR/>Therefore, I will be happy to address your contentions but first you must clarify them with direct quotes because I have learned that monkey boys, like their master, have no capacity to make honest arguments without relying upon false witness, as you have already demonstrated. So, please, in the interest of honesty, cite you specific concerns with specific words and I will respond.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-85311135908803057412008-01-05T13:56:00.000-08:002008-01-05T13:56:00.000-08:00To paraphrase Willie, counseling a rape victim:I h...To paraphrase Willie, counseling a rape victim:<BR/><BR/>I have no comment on their actions at this point since I couldn't get passed the irony of you calling them [rapists] when you, in fact, act like one when you engaged in this [extra-marital-sex].Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-67345246849209267122008-01-05T13:54:00.000-08:002008-01-05T13:54:00.000-08:00Mark,Like I said in my last post, I don't get wher...Mark,<BR/>Like I said in my last post, I don't get where there's any issue here. It would be helpful if you could establish 1a) where these guys have said the things you claim they did, 1b) what claims they were responding to (just to set the context), and 2) how this conversation shows that it wasn't true. I don't see, at present, anything of what you were saying. Remember that there are some of us who are newer to this conversation and don't have the benefit of having been embroiled in it from the beginning.<BR/><BR/>John Nicely<BR/>River CRC (Redlands, CA)<BR/><BR/>p.s., There is a severe twist of irony in you calling anonymous posters out on their not revealing their names when you are yourself unwilling to do so. Of course, there is a risk to you now that you've slandered a lot of people, and you can expect to be disciplined by your church for it, but it's better to be open and honest from the start, which would have restrained from saying things in the slanderous tone that you have.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-9121975491423676102008-01-05T11:46:00.000-08:002008-01-05T11:46:00.000-08:00In any other context I would take it as an insult,...In any other context I would take it as an insult, but you have demonstrated that your vocabulary is full of words you can’t define. I wish you well.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-5776197759421372042008-01-05T11:37:00.000-08:002008-01-05T11:37:00.000-08:00I truly pity you...I truly pity you...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09819442956662913188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-3822433378394335002008-01-05T11:17:00.000-08:002008-01-05T11:17:00.000-08:00Mr. Hill,Please accept my apology; I assumed you w...Mr. Hill,<BR/><BR/>Please accept my apology; I assumed you were yet one more anonymous monkey boy who was ashamed of his baptized name while he made anonymous accusations against me.<BR/><BR/>Citing Matthew 18 is a joke. As these men argued elsewhere, these sins were committed in public and therefore Matthew 18 does not apply. The same applies to speaking with them. What benefit is this to the Church? For one thing, it establishes many points that they have adamantly denied. For example, they have denied that they are a movement with an agenda. These emails suggest otherwise. They have denied that they use talking points. Again, these emails contradict this. They have affirmed that they are teachable. These emails certainly prove the opposite. In short, these emails confirm that the FVists are a factious sect with bad intentions.<BR/><BR/>Regarding gossip, you don’t know the meaning of the word, which probably accounts for your ignorance vis-à-vis the Ninth Commandment and a commitment you think I made. Please, if you’re opposed to gossip, then don’t bear tales, for as you said, it is sin.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-17470326483978597282008-01-05T10:55:00.000-08:002008-01-05T10:55:00.000-08:00My name is Bill (or William if you prefer -- or yo...My name is Bill (or William if you prefer -- or you can simply call me Mr. Hill).<BR/><BR/>I have no comment on their actions at this point since I couldn't get passed the irony of you calling them snakes when you, in fact, act like one when you engaged in this behavior.<BR/><BR/>What I am commenting on is your 9th commandment violation of spreading information that was not for public consumption. Tell me, did you speak with any of these men about these so called improprieties? Furthermore, even if what you are retelling is true (and not edited in any way which is impossible for anyone to know) what benefit to the Church does this offer? <BR/><BR/>If you think they are in sin then follow Matthew 18 and deal with it properly. What you have done is gossip and violated a commitment you have made to the owner of the email list that you joined under specific guidelines. Now either you personally took this information off the list or someone on the list forwarded the information to you for publication on your blog. Either way it is sin.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09819442956662913188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-33986623623186408152008-01-05T10:30:00.000-08:002008-01-05T10:30:00.000-08:00Willie,If my actions are deplorable and dishonest ...Willie,<BR/><BR/>If my actions are deplorable and dishonest then what say ye of the BH yahoos’ actions?Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-81836806534080428282008-01-05T10:25:00.000-08:002008-01-05T10:25:00.000-08:00The host of this blog has engaged in deplorable an...The host of this blog has engaged in deplorable and dishonest actions by posting these emails. He has also, on numerous occasions, acted in a spirit of hate and nastiness towards others. All of this is to say that the best way to silence someone like this is to simply not read his blog. It is not like he really has anything of substance to offer and the only thing he really does is highlight further the party line mentality that exists in the various camps. Old news if you ask me.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09819442956662913188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-25121111145823418142008-01-04T12:04:00.000-08:002008-01-04T12:04:00.000-08:00Monkey Boy,I stand by my statements as “off the to...Monkey Boy,<BR/><BR/>I stand by my statements as “off the top of my head.” If you have something more accurate I welcome it, but given your past I suspect you would strain at a typo to swallow a slave. If that’s the case I recommend you go peel a banana.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-24001720300585576712008-01-04T11:44:00.000-08:002008-01-04T11:44:00.000-08:00Mr. Mark,Some of your information about Trinity Re...Mr. Mark,<BR/><BR/>Some of your information about Trinity Reformed Church is erroneous. Please correct it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-6005381436463423592008-01-04T10:41:00.000-08:002008-01-04T10:41:00.000-08:00Sean,We rejoice to hear of Dr. Robbins’ health; I ...Sean,<BR/><BR/>We rejoice to hear of Dr. Robbins’ health; I was happy to see that he posted here not too long ago. (Way off subject, he and I share a mutual friend/acquaintance in Moscow.)<BR/><BR/>Interestingly, these guys all descend from Gary North’s family tree and that loon saw a conspiracy under every rock. How ironic that they have become the conspirators.Mark T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09673762599798493263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-2832352038871268602008-01-04T10:01:00.000-08:002008-01-04T10:01:00.000-08:00I don't look at your blog for a couple of days and...I don't look at your blog for a couple of days and look at what I miss! Dr. Robbins told me about this post this morning and evidently it's getting a lot of attention (he's doing very well BTW and praise God - to the chagrin of the FV men I'm sure). <BR/><BR/>I confess I've always shied away from conspiracy theories, but this is no theory. Although, anyone who has read Paul Elliot's book already knows this is par for the course.<BR/><BR/>"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove [expose] them.<BR/>For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light [or, all things become visible when they are exposed by the light]: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light."<BR/><BR/>You've done a real service exposing these dogs, may the Lord continue to bless the work of Foedero Schism.Sean Geretyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01483041680109436046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9097408555576085021.post-29536699737914570882008-01-04T09:21:00.000-08:002008-01-04T09:21:00.000-08:00Mark T,I don't see what the issue is here. Never ...Mark T,<BR/>I don't see what the issue is here. Never minding the fact that, as several have said here, you are a snake, and a dirty rotten one at that, I just don't get what the issue is. This conversation actually absolves, yet again, Wilson and others of various charges that have been levied against them.<BR/><BR/>God bless. <BR/>John Nicely<BR/>The River CRC (Redlands, CA)John Nicelyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08868403558975438858noreply@blogger.com